record between Federer vs Nadal

1.Grand Slams Roger 12-3 Rafa.

2.Roger Ranked no 1 for 237 consecutive weeks and Rafa no 1 for 0 week(Most consecutive weeks as World Number 2 than any player in the history behind Roger 160weeks.)

3.2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 82% 93% 95% 95% 88% nadal 56% 64% 89% 83% 82%. after roger got used to nadal's unusual style in 2006 wimbledon

4.After, Roger got used to Nadal's unusual style, Roger leaded Nadal 5-2 in head to head score.

5.Roger win 14 1000 masters series and Nadal won 9.

6.Roger win 53 ATP title and Rafa win 23.

7.Win Streak 2006–2007 Nadal Won 24 consecutive matches.

8.Federer to win three major tournaments in a calendar year three different times in his career ((2004 AU, WM and US), (2006 AU, WM and US) and (2007 AU, WM and US)) while Nadal win only 1 slam a year.

etc etc

nadal fans denying fact...

lol why do you nadal fans keep pretending not to know other records other than skewed h2h and keep trying to lie that Federer didn't dominate Nadal when you know very well federer dominated nadal before the illness?!?everybody knows that federer dominated nadal before he got the illness...who are you trying to fool?!? Federer also dominated Nadal 5-2 even in h2h when both are in their prime?!? how is that not domination?!?

for nadal fans who make lies and excuses

federer dominated nadal after he got used to his style 5-2 2006-2007...2006-2007 was nadal's prime also...and nadal fans are the one who always been bringing up the excuses for dominated by Roger when Roger was healthy like Nadal was young and competition was weak....and h2h is not the only record but nadal fans like you cherry pick only one record pathetically to deny... Roger getting illness from mono virus in 2008 is not excuse you retard nadal fan because Roger always had been dominating nadal for so many years right before the illness...!!! you guys try to ignore and disregard it because you guys already created lies that nadal got better as he was getting older, and lie contradict the truth... so when you guys says lie that Nadal was dominated by Federer because he was young, it's excuse but when I say the fact that It's not that but federer was getting ill in 2008, It's no excusse...It's the fact!!! and you guys are now so delusional by your own lies that stating fact feel like excuse?!? ridiculous....!!! think how long roger dominated nadal right before the illness!!! It's 5 straight years 5 years!!! so after dominating nadal for 5 years and getting ill means nadal got better than roger and you can ignore the illness of 5 years dominating champion right away just because it would suit good for your hero nadal?!? ridiculous!!! how can you dare guys try to ignore the fact that champion was getting ill and struggle with his game with the illness?!? 35 grandslams is not absurd for roger...he is well capable of that if he wasn't sick...but it's absurd for nadal...just because it's absurd for nadal doesn't mean it's absurd for federer!!! don't try to bring federer down into nadal's level...federer was in different level than nadal when he was healthy....